Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
MAQBAL AHAMAD @ MAQBAL @ MAKBUL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail being sought under cr.pc. (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations involve serious charges of fraud and forgery. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. contention raised about the nature of allegations and absence of the petitioner. (Para 8) |
| 4. conditions imposed for bail granted to the petitioner. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The aforementioned crime is registered on the basis of a private complaint filed by one Ramesh Babu against accused Nos.1 to 3, before the learned JMFC, Mysuru in PCR No.17/2021, which was referred to Police for investigation.
4. It is further alleged that the complainant approached the registration Department and collected the copy of Aadhar card and found that it is also fake and accused No.1 by name Dharaneshwara, i.e., the petitioner had withdrawn the HDFC Bank Cheque amounting to Rs.5,00,000/- through Mysuru Merchants Co-operative Bank.
6. It is further alleged, petitioner arraigned as accused No.1 by impersonating himself as the owner of the plot in question, created forged Aadhar card and other documents and got registered a sale agreement in favour of the complainant and all the accused colluding with each other, received a total sum of Rs.21,00,000/- an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
