Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
MAQBAL AHAMAD @ MAQBAL @ MAKBUL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. anticipatory bail being sought under cr.pc. (Para 1) |
| 2. allegations involve serious charges of fraud and forgery. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. contention raised about the nature of allegations and absence of the petitioner. (Para 8) |
| 4. conditions imposed for bail granted to the petitioner. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
Petitioner is seeking to enlarge him on anticipatory bail in Crime No.40/2021 of Vijayanagar Police Station, Mysuru City, registered for the offence punishable under Section 419 , 420 r/w 34 of IPC .
2. The aforementioned crime is registered on the basis of a private complaint filed by one Ramesh Babu against accused Nos.1 to 3, before the learned JMFC, Mysuru in PCR No.17/2021, which was referred to Police for investigation.
3. The gist of the complaint averments are that the complainant was interested to buy a plot in Mysuru and the accused by name T.Uday Kumar and Makbal Ahmed acting as brokers, sold plot No.247, MIG, E-Block, 3rd Stage, Vijayanagara, Devaraja Mohalla, Mysuru City, for a sale consideration of Rs.29,00,000/-. The complainant paid Rs.25,00,000/- and got registered the sale agreement on 13.12.2017 with a condition that another sum of Rs.4,00,000/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
