Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
DR. K.MANMADHA RAO, J
SRI. ZIYAULLA – Appellant
Versus
ADEEBA BANO – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the regular second appeal context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. overview of plaintiff’s claim about ownership and encroachment. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defendant’s position and framed issues for trial consideration. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. trial court findings and appeal issues. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. arguments of the appellant regarding proof of claims. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. court’s assertion of jurisdiction in a second appeal. (Para 18 , 19) |
CAV JUDGMENT
The present Regular Second Appeal is filed assailing the judgment and decree dated 19.02.2018, in R.A.No.67/2017 passed by the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kolar (hereinafter referred to as ‘the first appellate Court’) confirming the Judgement and decree dated 15.03.2017, in O.S.95/2008, passed by the Court of Principal Civil Judge & JMFC., at Srinivasapura (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’).
2. The appellant herein is the plaintiff/appellant before the Courts below and the respondent herein is the defendant/respondent before the Courts below.
3. For convenience of reference, the parties herein are referred to as per the rankings before the trial Court.
4. The plaintiff filed O.S.No.95/2008
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
