Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
SNEHA. R and ARAVIND GREGORY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA and DIVYA PURUSHOTHAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of criminal proceedings while civil suit is ongoing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. allegations and the dispute concerning authenticity. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 14) |
| 3. need for comprehensive adjudication in civil court. (Para 16 , 18 , 20) |
| 4. court's decision not to proceed with criminal action. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed seeking quashing of the proceedings pending in Crime No. 51/2024 for the offence punishable under Sections 407 , 420, 465 and 467 read with Section 34 of the IPC .
2. The facts leading to the case are as under:
The second respondent/defacto complainant filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C ., alleging that the petitioners forged her signatures and created fabricated documents styled as a rental agreement dated 16.12.2023 and an addendum to the memorandum of understanding dated 25.03.2022. It is further alleged that in the said forged documents, the petitioners have also forged the signature of the complainant’s husband, showing him as a witness to the addendum dated 25.03.2022 and also on a consent letter. Having noticed these forged documents, the complainant states that she approached one Shri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
