SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24332

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
MR.GANESH H.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SANDESH CHOUTA, SRI. MAHENDRA GOWDA. C.R.
For the Respondents: SRI. R. RANGASWAMY

Table of Content
1. maintainability of the petition under relevant laws. (Para 2)
2. court's evaluation of the law regarding bail in special circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. conclusion of the petition's status and court's order. (Para 7 , 8)

ORAL ORDER

2. This petition is preferred under Section 4 83 of the BNS S, 2023 for grant of bail to the petitioners in a case registered in Crime No.156/2025 of Kalasipalya Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offence punishable under Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act , 1908, Section 6(A) and 9(B) of the Explosives Act , 1884 and Section 288 , 61(1)(a) and

3. The Court which has rejected the bail petition is a Special Court for the Trial of NIA cases. Offences i.e., Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 are schedule offences under the Act.

5. Hence, office objections regarding maintainability is upheld.

7. In light of the above submission, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top