SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24332

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
MR.GANESH H.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12601 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. SANDESH CHOUTA, SRI. MAHENDRA GOWDA. C.R.
For the Respondents: SRI. R. RANGASWAMY

An appeal lies under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act, 2008 against a Special Court's order on bail, highlighting the maintainability of such petitions.

Headnote:This petition is filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking bail for offenses under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and related sections. The Court upheld the office's objection regarding the maintainability of the petition indicating that the appeal lies under Section 21(4) of the NIA Act, 2008 against the Special Court's order rejecting bail. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty given to appeal as per law.

Table of Content
1. maintainability of the petition under relevant laws. (Para 2)
2. court's evaluation of the law regarding bail in special circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. conclusion of the petition's status and court's order. (Para 7 , 8)

ORAL ORDER

Apart from other objections, office has raised objection regarding maintainability of the petition.

2. This petition is preferred under Section 4 83 of the BNS S, 2023 for grant of bail to the petitioners in a case registered in Crime No.156/2025 of Kalasipalya Police Station, Bengaluru City, for the offence punishable under Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act , 1908, Section 6(A) and 9(B) of the Explosives Act , 1884 and Section 288 , 61(1)(a) and

61(1)(b) of the BNS , 2023.

3. The Court which has rejected the bail petition is a Special Court for the Trial of NIA cases. Offences i.e., Section 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act, 1908 are schedule offences under the Act.

4. A plain reading of Section 21(4) of the NIA Act , 2008, indicates that an appeal lies to the High Court against an order of the Special Court, granting or refusing of bail.

5. Hence, office objections regarding maintainability is upheld.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that he may be permitted to file an appeal under Section 21(4) of the NIA, Act, 2008, challenging refusal of the bail by the Special Court.

7. In light of the above submission, petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as sought for.

8. Registry shall return the certified copies of the document furnished along with the petition, retaining photocopies of the same, forthwith.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top