Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
SRI. SHASHIKIRAN H.K. – Appellant
Versus
SMT.SURYAPRABHA J. @ PALLAVI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. maintenance claim particulars. (Para 1) |
| 2. examination of evidence presented in court. (Para 5) |
| 3. intention to suppress facts by non-appearance. (Para 6 , 8) |
ORAL ORDER
Aggrieved by the order passed in Crl.Misc.No.589/2020 dated 04.01.2022 by the III Addl. Principal Judge, Family Court, Mysuru, whereby the Family Court had granted maintenance an amount of Rs.10,000/- per month each to the wife and the child, both the husband and the wife are before this Court. The husband’s petition is RPFC.No.172/2023 and the wife’s petition is RPFC.18/2024 seeking enhancement of maintenance.
2. The parties are referred to as husband and wife for the sake of convenience.
3. When these matters came up on 28.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of both the husband and the wife. Hence, the matters were directed to be listed today under HC-KAR the caption for “dismissal”. Today, learned counsel for the wife is present, but there is no representation on behalf of the husband.
4. It is the case that the wife had filed Crl.Misc.
No.589/2020 seeking maintenance of an amount of Rs.75,000/- per month to herself and the child. It is the case of the wife that the marriage has taken place
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
