SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24400

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
THE BELLARY DISTRICT GHALIB CENTENARY CELEBRATIONS COMMITTEE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 105505 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI
For the Respondents: SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, SRI.S.S.CHALAWADI

Properties used solely for educational purposes may be exempt from property tax as determined in prior case law.

Headnote:The Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the demand notice of property tax imposed by the respondents. The petitioner argues an exemption for properties exclusively used for educational purposes based on prior case law. The court affirms that property tax can only be levied on sections not used educationally. Thus, the respondents are restrained from levying tax on the educational portion of the property.

Table of Content
1. the petitioner seeks to quash the property tax demand notice citing educational use. (Para 1)
2. the exemption status of property tax for educational purposes is debated. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court confirms prior ruling preventing tax on educational portions. (Para 5 , 6)
4. final decision on the petition reinstating the educational use tax exemption. (Para 7)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED DEMAND NOTICE OF PROPERTY TAX DEMANDING PROPERTY TAX DATED NIL AND NO. NIL TO THE TUNE OF RS.29,41,375/- REFERRING TO THE REVIEW MEETING OF RESPONDENT NO.2 HELD ON 22.10.2021 FOR DEVELOPMENT OF REVENUE DIVISION UNDER Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act 1976, ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT, IN RESPECT OF GHALIB SCHOOL, JAYANAGAR, WARD NO.34, BALLARI, BELONGING TO THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)

1. Sri.S.S.Chalawadi., learned counsel is directed to accept notice for respondents No.2 and 3. Registry is directed to delete the name of Sri.C.V.Angadi., as that appearing for respondents No.2 and 3.

2. The Petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned demand notice of property tax demanding property tax dated Nil and No. Nil to the tune of Rs.29,41,375/- Referring to the Review meeting of Respondent No.2 held on 22.10.2021 for development of Revenue Division under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act 1976, issued by the 3rd Respondent, in respect of Ghalib School, Jayanagar, Ward No.34, Ballari, belonging to the Petitioner, vide Annexure-E, b. Issue such other writ or order as deemed fit in the interest of Justice and Equity.

3. The petitioner is before this Court, aggrieved by the action of the respondents in levying property tax on the petitioners’ property, which is stated to be used exclusively for the purpose of carrying on educational activities.

4. Relying on the judgment of this Court in W.P.

No.87922/2012, dated 23.05.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that insofar as any property which is used exclusively for educational purposes, there is an exemption from payment of property tax.

5. Heard Smt.Gayatri.S.R., learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Sharad V Magadum, learned AGA for respondent No.1 and Sri.S.S.Chalawadi., learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3 and perused the papers.

6. In view of the order dated 23.05.2023, passed in W.P.

No. 87922/2012, the respondents cannot levy property tax on the portion of the property used exclusively for educational purposes. Accordingly, the respondents can levy property tax only on those portions of the property which are not exclusively used for educational purposes.

7. In light of the above, I pass the following

ORDER

i. The writ petition is allowed ii. The respondents are restrained from levying property tax in respect of the portion of the property used exclusively for educational purposes.

iii. Liberty is reserved to the respondents to conduct survey of the property, ascertain the portions not exclusively used for educational purposes, and to issue necessary notices under the applicable provisions of law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top