Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
DEEPAK A – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY THILAKANAGAR POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of complaint and accused parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural context and evidence overview. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding validity of allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's stance on the need for investigation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 20) |
| 5. distinction between civil and criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 6. dismissal of petition due to lack of merit. (Para 21 , 22) |
CAV ORDER
2. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that on 18.01.2024, the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant filed the impugned complaint against the petitioners – accused 1 to 3, Arokiadas – accused No.4, Dhiraj Jain – accused No.5 and Ashok – accused No.6 interalia alleging that she was the daughter and beneficiary under a Will dated 21.08.2014 executed by her father Dr.S.Krishna Kumar in her favour in relation to various properties including House No.1251, 32nd 'G' cross, 4th 'T' block, Jayanagar, Bangalore – 41, comprising of 1 unit in the ground floor and 3 units in the first floor. It was alleged that all the accused persons colluded with each other and fraudulently, forged and created an alleged power of attorney dated 31.05.2022 alleged to have been ex
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
