Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
DEEPAK A – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY THILAKANAGAR POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of complaint and accused parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. procedural context and evidence overview. (Para 4 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments regarding validity of allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's stance on the need for investigation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 20) |
| 5. distinction between civil and criminal proceedings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 6. dismissal of petition due to lack of merit. (Para 21 , 22) |
CAV ORDER
In this petition, petitioners - accused Nos. 1 to 3 seek quashing of the impugned complaint and FIR registered as Crime No.13/2024 dated 30.01.2024 before the 1st respondent – police authorities and for other reliefs.
2. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that on 18.01.2024, the 2nd respondent - de facto complainant filed the impugned complaint against the petitioners – accused 1 to 3, Arokiadas – accused No.4, Dhiraj Jain – accused No.5 and Ashok – accused No.6 interalia alleging that she was the daughter and beneficiary under a Will dated 21.08.2014 executed by her father Dr.S.Krishna Kumar in her favour in relation to various properties including House No.1251, 32nd 'G' cross, 4th 'T' block, Jayanagar, Bangalore – 41, comprising of 1 unit in the gro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
