Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, J
SHIVAPURATHRAPPA HOMBALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY UPPERPET TRAFFIC POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in appeal filing was contested and led to application dismissal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. court emphasized a liberal stance on granting delay condonation. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. the need for presence in court highlighted regarding delay explanation. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. petitioner convicted under various ipc sections and motor vehicles act. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed assailing the order dated 02.07.2018 passed by LVIII Additional Sessions Judge, Bengaluru in Criminal Appeal No.746/2017 dismissing the application for condonation of delay of 12 days and also the appeal as barred by limitation.
2. Petitioner is convicted for offence under Sections
279, 337, 338, 304-A of Indian Penal Code and Section 119 read with Section 177 of Indian Motor Vehicles Act .
3. Accused filed an appeal challenging the aforementioned conviction and sentence passed by the Trial Court. There was delay of 12 days in filing the appeal. An application was filed to condone the delay of 12 days and also for suspension of sentence.
4. The Appellate Court suspended the sentence pending consideration of application for condonation of delay of 12 days. Later, when the matter was listed for enqui
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
