KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, C.M. POONACHA, JJ
SRI. SANJAY S/O. SADASHIV SURYAVANSHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RANJANA W/O. SHANKAR SHINDHE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the context of the trial and the basis for the appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. considerations on defendants' opportunities for fair action. (Para 7 , 8) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA)
2. The relevant facts are that the defendant No.1 is the brother of the plaintiff; the defendant No.2 is the wife of defendant No.1 and defendant Nos.3 to 6 are the children of the plaintiff.
4. Defendant Nos.1, 2, 4 and 5 entered appearance before the Trial Court. Defendant Nos.3 and 6 were placed ex-parte. Defendant Nos.1 and 2 filed written statements, which was adopted by defendant Nos.4 and 5. In the written statements, the defendants contended that they had spent considerable amount in the criminal proceedings for release of the plaintiff, as also for the marriage of the children of the plaintiff. In the said context, the General Power of Attorney dated 25.06.2003, was executed. Hence, the defendants denied the case put forth by the plaintiff.
“The plaintiff’s suit is hereby decreed in part.
The general power of attorney dated
Further, the relinquishment deed dated
All the acts and deeds done by defendant-
By way of permanent injunction, the defendants 1 and 2 are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.