Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
J.M.KHAZI, J
PARAMASHIVAIAH, S/O LATE NEELAKANTE GOWDA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural actions regarding legal representation. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petitions. (Para 2) |
| 3. court fulfills procedural requests leading to dismissal without further order. (Para 3 , 4) |
ORAL ORDER
Since, Sri A.C.Balaraj, learned counsel has filed vakalath for the petitioner, office is directed to delete the name of Sri M.B.Chandrachooda, learned counsel, who was representing the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
3. In the light of the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In view of the disposal of the petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required.
HC-KAR
5. This petition is de-linked from Crl.P No.4025/2023.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
