Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K.S. HEMALEKHA, J
SMT. NISCHITA .N @ PREKSHA – Appellant
Versus
SRI SHIVARANJAN K.J. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. transfer admittance based on travel hardship. (Para 4) |
| 2. wife's convenience is paramount in transfer decisions. (Para 5) |
| 3. judicial precedent reinforcing women's convenience in transfers. (Para 6) |
| 4. civil petition allowed with directives. (Para 7) |
ORAL ORDER
The present petition is filed by the wife seeking to withdraw and transfer M.C.No.105/2024, instituted by the respondent-husband seeking restitution of conjugal rights by invoking provisions under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (‘Act’ for short), pending on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Maddur to III Additional Family Court, Bengaluru where M.C.No.3332/2024 instituted by the petitioner-wife is pending adjudication.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Though the respondent was served with notice, he has chosen to remain absent. There is no representation. 3. The marriage between the petitioner and respondent was solemnized on 15.03.2020, as per the customs prevailing in their community. Due to strained relation, the parties are residing separately for quite some time.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is presently residing in Bengal
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
