Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24788

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
SACHIN. B @ KAMBALI SACHIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY HOSANAGAR POLICE – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 13409 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. BIMBADHARA
For the Respondents: SRI. R.RANGASWAMY

Withdrawal of petition without prejudice to appeal against dismissal.

Headnote:The petition, filed under section 438 of the Cr.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail for the petitioners concerning charges under sections 352, 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 109(1) R/W 190 of BNS, and SC/ST (POA) Act. The Court addressed objections regarding maintainability and allowed the petitioner to withdraw his plea with liberty to appeal. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with directions on document handling.

Table of Content
1. addressing maintainability objections. (Para 1 , 2)
2. allowing the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to appeal. (Para 3 , 4)

ORAL ORDER

Office has raised an objection regarding maintainability of the petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, with a liberty to file an appeal against the dismissal of his petition by the learned Sessions Judge, seeking anticipatory bail.

3. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal.

4. Registry shall return all the original documents furnished along with the petition including the vakalath, forthwith, retaining photocopies of the same.

Sd/-

(MOHAMMAD NAWAZ)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document