Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24806
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
SRI WASEEM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
SMT. FARHANA KAHNUM – Respondent
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 295 OF 2022
Important Points
A petition can be withdrawn without further orders if the parties have settled their matter amicably.
Subject
Family Law - Maintenance
Act Referred
Family Courts Act: S.19(4)
Headnote
This case concerns whether the court should proceed with a review petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against an order of maintenance partially allowed by the Family Judge. The petitioner states the matter is settled amicably. The court determines that no further orders are necessary due to the settlement. The final outcome: "Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn."
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT. ARCHANA MURTHY
For the Respondents: SRI. GAURAV SUBRAMANYAM
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT. ARCHANA MURTHY
For the Respondents: SRI. GAURAV SUBRAMANYAM
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties settled matter, petition withdrawn. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. rpfc dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
It is submitted that the parties have already settled the matter. Hence, a memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. No further order requires to be passed when the parties have already settled the matter.
4. Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn.
