SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24806

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J
SRI WASEEM KHAN – Appellant
Versus
SMT. FARHANA KAHNUM – Respondent
REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 295 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT. ARCHANA MURTHY
For the Respondents: SRI. GAURAV SUBRAMANYAM

A petition can be withdrawn without further orders if the parties have settled their matter amicably.

Headnote:This case concerns whether the court should proceed with a review petition under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act against an order of maintenance partially allowed by the Family Judge. The petitioner states the matter is settled amicably. The court determines that no further orders are necessary due to the settlement. The final outcome: "Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn."

Table of Content
1. parties settled matter, petition withdrawn. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. rpfc dismissed as withdrawn. (Para 4)

ORAL ORDER

It is submitted that the parties have already settled the matter. Hence, a memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. No further order requires to be passed when the parties have already settled the matter.

4. Accordingly, the RPFC is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top