Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ASHOK S. KINAGI, J
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER N.W.K.R.T.C. DIVISIONAL OFFICE, BELAGAVI – Appellant
Versus
SHRI. KASIMSAB MUGUTSAB JAKATI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the case facts and initial tribunal findings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties regarding the compensation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's considerations on the compensation quantum. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final decision and modification of the award. (Para 16) |
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)
2. The brief facts leading rise to the filing of this appeal are as follows:
4. The respondent - NWKSRTC filed a statement of objections denying the averments made in the claim petition and prays to dismiss the claim petition.
6. The petitioner to substantiate his case examined himself as PW.1 and got marked 10 documents as Exhibit P1 to P10. The NWKSRTC examined the driver as RW.1 and no documents were marked.
8. The NWKSRTC being aggrieved by the impugned judgment filed this Miscellaneous First Appeal.
10. Learned counsel for the NWKSRTC submits that the petitioner to prove the permanent disability has not examined the doctor. In the absence of evidence of the doctor, the Tribunal has committed an error in awarding global compensation of ₹1,25,000/-. He submits that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is on the higher s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
