Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, C.M. POONACHA, JJ
LAXMAN S/O. SIDDAPPA PASCHAPUR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SHANTAWWA W/O. FAKIRAGOUDA PATIL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals arise from prior suit judgments (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. plaintiff claims ancestral property rights (Para 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 3. trial court's issues framed for resolution (Para 12 , 13) |
| 4. evidence presented by parties during trial (Para 14 , 17) |
| 5. legal conclusions on property ownership (Para 21 , 23 , 35) |
| 6. final judgment modifies trial court's decree (Para 45 , 46) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR)
2. RFA.No.100561/2019 is preferred by defendant Nos.6, 7, 9 and 10, while RFA.No.100152/2020 and RFA.No.100113/ 2020 are preferred by defendant Nos.8 and 5 respectively in O.S.No.90/2014.
3. All these appeals arise out of the judgment and decree dated 18.11.2019 passed in O.S.No.90/2014 by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Gokak, [Hereinafter referred to as the ‘Trial Court’]
4. The said suit filed by the sole plaintiff-Shantawwa, for partition and separate possession of her alleged share in the suit schedule properties, for declaration, injunction and other reliefs was partly decreed by the Trial Court in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants.
5. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as their respectiv
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
