Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MOHAMMAD NAWAZ, J
FAISAL AHMED – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fraudulent online investment scheme (Para 2 , 4 , 14) |
| 2. allegations and implications of the accused (Para 7 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. reasoning for bail application denial (Para 8 , 18) |
| 4. court's observations on economic offences (Para 10 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. final decision of the court (Para 19) |
CAV ORDER
2. The aforementioned case is registered on the first information lodged by one Smt.Shashikala D.G., wife of Gangadharappa, against an unknown person, referring to Mobile No.8768645483.
4. Brief facts of the case:- The first informant is a resident of Davangere. She holds an SBI Account No.64108482486, IFSC SBIN0040792, linked to her mobile No.8971956067 and connected to Phonepe and Google Pay. Her sister, father and aunt also have accounts in SBI, HDFC and Canara Bank with linked mobile numbers and UPI apps. On 31.05.2024, at about 4.00 p.m., she received a message from mobile No.8768645483 through Telegram application, inducing her to believe that by performing online “rating Tasks” through a website and Telegram group titled “Rank My APP 5091”, she would earn daily commission. She was initially credited with small bonus amounts to gain her confidence, and thereafter she was persuad
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
