Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
J.ANNAPOORNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
HARSHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought temporary injunction which became unnecessary. (Para 1) |
| 2. court considers withdrawal memo. (Para 2) |
| 3. dismissal of petition as infructuous. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
A memo for withdrawal has been filed by Sri.S.V.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stating that the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. This petition is dismissed as infructuous Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
