KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
J.ANNAPOORNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
HARSHA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 3804 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought temporary injunction which became unnecessary. (Para 1) |
| 2. court considers withdrawal memo. (Para 2) |
| 3. dismissal of petition as infructuous. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
A memo for withdrawal has been filed by Sri.S.V.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stating that the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. This petition is dismissed as infructuous Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.