Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24956
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
J.ANNAPOORNAMMA – Appellant
Versus
HARSHA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 3804 OF 2022 (GM-CPC)
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.V.PRAKASH
For the Respondents: HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.V.PRAKASH
For the Respondents: HIREMATHAD MAHESHIAH RUDRAYYA
A writ petition can be dismissed as infructuous if subsequent events render the relief sought ineffective.
Headnote:This case discusses a writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution seeking to set aside the orders of the lower courts denying a temporary injunction in an ongoing suit. The petitioner requested to allow an application for injunction but later filed a memo stating the petition became infructuous. The court ultimately dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner sought temporary injunction which became unnecessary. (Para 1) |
| 2. court considers withdrawal memo. (Para 2) |
| 3. dismissal of petition as infructuous. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
A memo for withdrawal has been filed by Sri.S.V.Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner stating that the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. This petition is dismissed as infructuous Sd/-
