Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
SRI. S. NANDAGOPAL REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SRI. NAGARAJACHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and grounds for seeking relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. assessment of the health claims related to court attendance. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning on maintainability and dismissal of the application. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. This petition has been filed seeking the following relief:
a) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ or direction and to quash the impugned order dated 30.01.2023 in OS No.198/2011 on IA No.11 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Devahanahalli, as per Annexure-A to the writ petition and consequently to quash the order dated 14.07.2023 on IA No.12 passed by the Prl. Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Devanahalli, as per Annexure-B to the writ petition.
b) To pass such other order/s as deems fit by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.
3. It is evident from the record that IA No.11 was moved by the petitioner, who was the defendant No.4 in the suit seeking appointment of the Special Power of Attorney holder at the stage of defendants' evidence. It had been stated that, due to old age health conditions, the defendant No.4 has appointed as the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
