Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
SRI. S. NANDAGOPAL REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SRI. NAGARAJACHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and grounds for seeking relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. assessment of the health claims related to court attendance. (Para 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning on maintainability and dismissal of the application. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORAL ORDER
2. This petition has been filed seeking the following relief:
b) To pass such other order/s as deems fit by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case.
4. I have perused the IA No.11 and find that the sole prayer made therein was to permit the Special Power of Attorney to appear on behalf of the defendant No.4 to prosecute the case. In his affidavit in support of the aforesaid IA, it has been stated by the petitioner that, he is residing at Tada, Nellur District, Andhra Pradesh and due to his old age health reasons, post COVID Symptoms, he is unable to travel and attend the Court proceedings and hence he has executed the Special Power of Attorney in favour of Sri. A. Sreenivasulu, who is his manager for looking after the subject property since from the date of transaction of the property.
6. As far as IA No.12 is concerned, evidently it merely sought review of the order passed by the Court allowing IA No.4. IA No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
