SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 24985

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
JAYANT BANERJI, J
SMT APARNA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
SMT VENKATAMMA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 27696 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. D.R. RAVISHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. SIRI RAJASHEKAR
For the Respondents:

The court dismissed the writ petition at the petitioner's request, affirming the authority to withdraw the case.

Headnote:The case involves a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner sought to quash an order from the District and Sessions Judge. The court found that the petitioner does not wish to pursue the petition and has requested its withdrawal. The court determined that the petition was dismissed.

ORAL ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that, he does not wish to press this petition and wants to withdraw the same.

This petition is accordingly dismissed Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top