KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
KIRAN S/O UMESH CHOUDAPPANAVAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application based on investigation status and no prior convictions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court determines bail based on factual circumstances and legal provisions. (Para 3 , 5) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
Accused Nos.1, 3 and 4 in Crime No.89 of 2025 registered by Malamaruthi Police Station, Belagavi, for offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 109, 352, 351(3), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3 (1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(v), 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015 and Section 27(1) of Indian Arms Act, 1959 , are before this Court in this appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking regular bail.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned HCGP for respondent No.1. Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4, who are the first informant and the victims respectively, in the present case, are served and unrepresented before this Court.
5. Undisputedly, the appellants herein do not have criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is completed and charge sheet has been filed. Therefore, I am of the opinion that prayer mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.