Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV, VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL, JJ
SRI. MAHADEVAYYA MATAPATI S/O SIDDAYYA – Appellant
Versus
SMT. CHAITRA R.G. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual context about the accident and claim by kin. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding income and compensation disputes. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's assessment of compensation based on evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 4. ruling on modified frameworks for compensation distribution. (Para 11 , 13) |
| 5. final decision on compensation adjustments and orders. (Para 15) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL) MFA No.100634/2020 is filed by the parents of the deceased, MFA Crob No.100055/2020 is filed by the wife of the deceased and MFA No.100833/2020 is filed by the insurance company challenging the quantum of compensation awarded under judgment and award dated 4.10.2019 passed in MVC No.203/2017 on the file of learned MACT-III, Ballari, [For short, ‘Tribunal’]
2. Brief facts giving rise to filing of these appeals are that wife of the deceased Swaroop Mahadevayya filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act , 1988 claiming compensation on the ground that her husband Swaroop met with road accident on 3.3.2017 due to rash and negligent driving of the Tata Sumo Vehicle Bearing registration No.KA-01-AB-7748 by its driver. It is averred that the d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
