Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
R. DEVDAS, J
SRI. DODDAGIRIYAPPACHARI – Appellant
Versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of land dispute and previous rulings (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments on legal standing and delays (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. allegations of collusion and legal interpretations (Para 7 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. interpretation of statutory provisions and previous rulings (Para 11 , 15 , 21) |
| 5. final ruling on the merits of the writ petition (Para 18 , 20 , 29) |
CAV ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS)
The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned order at Annexure-W dated 22.04.2025 passed by the respondent No.1-Deputy Commissioner, Bengaluru Urban District and the order dated 27.09.2024 passed by respondent No.2- Assistant Commissioner at Annexure-T.
2. The undisputed facts leading to the writ petition are that Smt.Kenchamma and her son Sri Muninarayanappa had earlier invoked the jurisdiction of the Assistant Commissioner, under the provisions of the Karnataka Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act, 1978 , (hereinafter referred to as ‘the PTCL Act’ for short) calling in question the sale deed dated 25.10.1956, under which 3 acres 26 guntas of land in Sy.No.143 of Khaji Sonnenahalli Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru East Ta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
