Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ASHOK S. KINAGI, UMESH M ADIGA, JJ
NANDKISHOR S/O VIRUPAX BIDKAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MANGALA W/O UMAKANT RAGATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the family property and previous partition. (Para 4) |
| 2. issues surrounding the inheritance of property. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity of the will. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. suspicion surrounding the execution of the will. (Para 18 , 22) |
| 5. confirmation of trial court's decision. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 6. final order regarding the dismissal of appeals. (Para 28) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI)
These two appeals are filed challenging the common judgment and decree dated 23.02.2019 passed in O.S. No.68/2017 clubbed with O.S. No. 246/2015 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Belagavi.
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, as per their ranking in O.S. No.246/2015. The appellant was the defendant, and the respondents were the plaintiffs.
3. The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant for partition and separate possession in O.S. No.246/2015. The defendant filed a suit for the relief of declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction in O.S.No.68/2017.
4. Brief facts leading rise to the filing of O.S. No.246/2015 are as under:
One Sri. Balappa Bidkar was the original propositus. He was the resid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
