Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ASHOK S. KINAGI, UMESH M ADIGA, JJ
NANDKISHOR S/O VIRUPAX BIDKAR – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MANGALA W/O UMAKANT RAGATE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the family property and previous partition. (Para 4) |
| 2. issues surrounding the inheritance of property. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. arguments regarding the validity of the will. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. suspicion surrounding the execution of the will. (Para 18 , 22) |
| 5. confirmation of trial court's decision. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 6. final order regarding the dismissal of appeals. (Para 28) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
These two appeals are filed challenging the common judgment and decree dated 23.02.2019 passed in O.S. No.68/2017 clubbed with O.S. No. 246/2015 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Belagavi.
3. The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant for partition and separate possession in O.S. No.246/2015. The defendant filed a suit for the relief of declaration and consequential relief of permanent injunction in O.S.No.68/2017.
One Sri. Balappa Bidkar was the original propositus. He was the resident of Beed village near Kolhapur in Maharashtra State. For the sake of his livelihood, he came to Ichalkaranji along with his only son Sri. Mahadev and settled there.Balappa died at Ichalkaranji. Mahadev started a petty business of watch repairing and gradually, went on purchasing ha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
