KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K.NATARAJAN, J
SRI. ANAND KUMAR S/O. LATE BORAIAH AND MANGALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR P M S/O. LATE MUDDAGANGAPPA. P. N. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of joint family property dispute (Para 1 , 4 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 11) |
| 2. arguments regarding the maintainability of the suit (Para 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 3. court’s reasoning on limitation and rejection of plaint (Para 14 , 16 , 26 , 29 , 33) |
| 4. judicial principles related to mixed questions of law and fact (Para 22 , 31) |
| 5. judgment concludes with the appeal being allowed (Para 37) |
CAV JUDGMENT
2. Heard the arguments of learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants' Counsel and learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents' Counsel.
4. The case of the appellants-plaintiffs is that they have filled the aforesaid suit for partition and separate possession of the suit schedule properties and for mesne profits, under Order XX Rule 12 of CPC , from the date of suit till the date of effecting partition. 5. The claim of the plaintiffs in their suit is that, plaintiffs and defendants No.1 to 48 are the members of undivided Hindu joint family being the descendants of Boranna, who was their propositor and the Plaintiffs and Defendants are the successors and co- parceners of Hindu Undivided joint family. The said Boranna died leaving behind four sons namely, Nanjundapp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.