KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SMT MANGALAMMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WP 2542 / 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 2542 OF 2020 (LB-ELE)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT MANGALAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O SRI SHIVANNA RESIDENT OF HALAGUR VILLAGE, HALAGUR POST - 571 421 HALAGUR HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI GIRIDHAR H, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATHRAJ VIKASA SOUDHA AMBEDKAR VEEDHI Digitally signed by BENGALURU - 560 001 KIRAN REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
KUMAR R Location:
HIGH
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER COURT OF KARNATAKA MANDYA SUB DIVISION, MANDYA DISTRICT.
3. SRI SHIVAMADHU S/O SRI LATE MANCHEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
4. SRI BORAIAH S/O SRI KUNDURAIAH, 5. SRI H M SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE MAHADEVAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
6. SRI H R KRISHNA S/O LATE H T RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
7. SRI M SHRIKANTASWAMI S/O SRI K P MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
8. SMT. LAKSHAMMA H K W/O SRI THAMMAIAH AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. 9. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O SRI SHIVANNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
10. SMT. MANGALA W/O SRI SIDDAPAJJI AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
11. SRI LAYAKATH ALI A K A PILLU S/O SRI MOHAMMED SHAFIRULLA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
12. SRI SAHANAS BEGUM HUSBAND NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
13. SRI K KRISHNEGOWDA S/O SRI KULLASIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 14. SMT. A B LAKSHMI W/O SRI C NAGARAJU, 15. SMT. RUKSANA BEGUM W/O SRI ILIYAS PASHA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.
16. SRI B N NAVEEN S/O SRI NAGARAJU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
17. SMT. NETHRANGAMANI W/O SRI K C MAHESH AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS.
18. SMT. JAYAMADHAMMA H C W/O SRI KEMPEGOWDA H C AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS.
19. SRI K S GANGADHARGOWDA S/O SRI SHIVALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.
20. SMT. MALAMMA W/O SRI MARIKANDEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 21. SMT. MUNILAKSHMI W/O SRI RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS.
REPONDENT NOS. 3 TO 21 ARE MEMBERS HALAGURU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, HALAGURU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2;
R-3 TO R-21 SD & UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WP FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ANNEXURE-C NOTICE OF MEETING DATED 21.01.2020 ISSUED BY THE R-2 TO BE HELD ON 10.02.2020 AT 12.00 P.M PASSING OF RESOLUTION EXPRESSING WANT OF CONFIDENCE IN THE PETITION AS PER ANNEXURE-B NOTICE OF INTENTION DATED 14.01.2020 DELIVERED TO THE R-2 BY THE R-3 TO 21 OF MAKING MOTION FOR PASSING OF RESOLUTION EXPRESSING WANT OF CONFIDENCE OF THE PETITIONER.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
ORAL ORDER
1. It is submitted that the prayers sought for in this writ petition had been rendered infructuous.
2. In the light of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
(N S SANJAY GOWDA)
JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.