SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 25823

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MS. NAIMA AKTHAR NAGARIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2845 OF 2023 | CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2064 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. S. SRIRANGA, SMT. SUMANA NAGANAND
For the Respondents: SMT. RASHMI JADHAV

Mere reference to caste without intention to insult or humiliate does not constitute an offence under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Headnote:(A) Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), and 3(1)(v) - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 153A, 149, and 295A - Criminal petition to quash FIR alleging offences under SC/ST Act and IPC - Court held that the complaint lacks requisite ingredients to establish offences as it does not satisfy the necessary intention to insult a member of SC/ST community - The performance was done for entertainment purposes, and allegations of caste-based insult were unfounded. (Paras 4, 10, 11, 12, and 26)

(B) Jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. - High Court can quash proceedings to prevent abuse of process of law and ensure justice - Basic ingredients of the offences must be established for the complaint to stand. (Paras 5 and 12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners including students and faculty contested FIR for purportedly insulting a community during a skit at a university event. Complaint lacked evidence of intent to insult or humiliate against SC/ST based on their caste.

Findings of Court:
Impugned FIR quashed due to absence of essential elements constituting alleged offences.

Issues: Whether the complaint sufficiently established the requisite elements of offences under SC/ST Act and IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that mere mention of caste with no evidence of malevolent intent cannot sustain charges under the SC/ST Act.

Result: Both petitions allowed, FIR quashed.

Table of Content
1. identification of parties and allegations. (Para 4)
2. arguments against fir and claim of satire. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's jurisdiction to prevent abuse of process. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
4. mandatory elements needed for sc/st act application. (Para 12)

ORAL ORDER

In Crl.P.No.2845/2023, petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:-

“ 1. Call for records pertaining to Crime No. 32/2023 pending on the files of LXX City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH71);

2. Quash the First Information Report No. 32/2023 dated: 10.02.2023 (Annexure-A) lodged by the 1st Respondent (Siddapura Police Station) and Complaint dated: 10.02.2023 (Annexure-B) filed by the 2nd Respondent as against the Petitioners herein;

3. Consequently, quash FIR No.32/2023 pending on the filed of LXX City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH71), Bengaluru as against the Petitioners herein under Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1) (s) and 3(1) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 153A , 149 and 295A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ; and

4. Grant such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.”

In Crl.P.No.2064/2023, petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:-

“ 1. Call for records pertaining to Crime No.32/2023 pending on the files of LXX Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, and Special Judge At Bengaluru (CCH71);

2. Quash the First Information Report dated:10.02.2023 (Annexure-A) lodged by the 1st Respondent (Siddapura Police Station) and Complaint dated: 10.02.2023 (Annexure-B) filed by the 2nd Respondent as against the Petitioners herein;

3. Consequently, quash Crime No..32/2023 pending on the filed of LXX Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH71), Bengaluru as against the Petitioners herein under Sections 3(1)(r) 3(1) (s) and 3(1)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and Sections 153A , 149 and 295A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ; and

4. Grant such other reliefs that this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the interest of justice.”

2. Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl.SPP for 1st respondent-State. Though notice of this petition has been served upon the 2nd respondent, he has chosen to remain absent and unrepresented.

3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioners-accused 2 and 3 in Crl.P.No.2064/2023 are faculty members of Jain Centre of Management Studies (Deemed University) while the petitioners-accused 4 to 10 in Crl.P.No.2845/2023 are students of the said Institution. The said University organized the Jain University Youth Fest-2023 at NIMHANS Convention Centre, in which, the students presented many programmes amongst which, the petitioners – students enacted a skit / short play to showcase their acting skills. A compact disk (CD) containing the video of the same was made the basis by the 2nd respondent to file the complaint against the petitioners for alleged offences under Sections 153-A, 149 and 295-A IPC and Section 3(1)(r)(s) and (v) of the Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, dated 10.02.2023.

4. A perusal of the alleged complaint and impugned FIR as well as the transcript of the short play / skit enacted during the aforesaid event organized by the aforesaid Institution is sufficient to come to the conclusion that the necessary ingredients constituting the aforesaid offences are conspicuously absent, especially when the said skit / short play was done for mere / sheer entertainment purposes and not with any intention to harm or humiliate any community or race nor make any reference to a particular religion or religious belief. It is pertinent to note that the impugned FIR has not been lodged by a person who is the member of the SC/ST community and there is no material to indicate that the petitioners had any specific intention to insult or intimidate with an intent to humiliate a member of SC/ST comm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top