Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MR SUDHEENDRA SEENA POOJARY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks defreezing of bank account based on quashed fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented about improper trial court considerations. (Para 5 , 6 , 11) |
| 3. court analysis of trial court errors and procedure violations. (Para 7 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. due process under pmla emphasized in freezing actions. (Para 8 , 10) |
ORAL ORDER
“Wherefore, the petitioner most humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to set aside the order dated 20.10.2023 passed in Criminal Mis.No.7013/2023 on the file of Hon’ble Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru City and consequently issue direction to defreeze his bank account No.004910500063985 in Bharath Co- operative Bank (Mumbai) Ltd., Kundapura Branch, in ECIR/BGZO/02/2021/970 and allow him to operate the above said Bank account, on such terms and condition, in the ends of justice.”
3. The petitioner preferred Crl.P.No.7735/2019 seeking quashing of the aforesaid FIR in Crime No.177/2019 which was allowed by this Court vide final order dated 26.02.2020. Subsequently, the respondent / ED authorities issued the instant Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR ) dated 13.01.2021 based on the aforesaid FIR in Crime No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
