Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SHIVAKUMAR S/O. HANAMATHA CHAVAN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY YADGIRI TOWN POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of the parties involved in the petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the allegations and legality. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis of the unlawful assembly and examination of evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. legal principles governing the assembly and liability under ipc. (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
Heard the learned Senior Counsel Sri Sandesh J. Chouta appearing for the petitioner.
2. Learned Senior Counsel taking this Court through the documents appended to the petition would seek to demonstrate that the offences alleged are not made out even to its remoteness. He would further contend that the issue in the lis is answered by the judgment rendered by this Court in Crl.P.No.4067/2023.
3. Learned HCGP would not dispute the position of law as is laid down by this Court. Therefore, the submission is in union.
4. This Court in Crl.P.No.4067/2023 has held as follows:
“3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the issue in the lis stands covered by two orders passed by, one by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Crl.P.No.3916/2018 disposed on 17.02.2020 and one by this Court in Crl.P.No.7575/2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
