Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MR. DHANARAM PATEL S/O NARAYAN RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY EXCISE INSPECTOR, NORTH RANGE, TUMKURU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner’s fir quashing request. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner argues legal violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. ambiguities in laboratory report. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. lack of sufficient evidence for conviction. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 21) |
| 5. court quashes impugned proceedings. (Para 22 , 23) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
(1) To quash the FIR registered in FIR No.9/2022-23/3002DYSE/300215 for offence U/S 20(b)(ii)(c), 25, 8(C) at Annexure-B as illegal and abuse of process of law.
(2) To Quash the Charge Sheet filed by Respondent No.1 which is registered as Spl.C.No.249/2023 on the file of Hon’ble Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tumakuru in FIR No. 9/2022-23/3002DYSE/300215 on the file of Respondent No.1 for offence U/S 20(b)(ii)(c), 25, 8(C) as per Annexure-C as abuse of process of law.
(3) To set aside the order of cognizance dated 07.02.2023 and issue of process dated 09.02.2023 passed in Spl.C.No.249/2023 for offence U/S 20(b)(ii)(c), 25, 8(C) on the file of Hon’ble Principal District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur as per Annexure-D as illegal and abuse of process of law.
(4) To set aside the Order d
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
