Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M.NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI. CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O SHIVAPPA GOSALADODDI – Appellant
Versus
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER/DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, KKRTC, KOPPAL DIVISION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. employee's rights and organizational duties (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. right to work-life balance and health (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. suspension deemed unjust due to excessive work hours (Para 13) |
| 4. writ petition allowed; suspension quashed (Para 14) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order of suspension dated 01.07.2024, passed by the respondent, by which the petitioner is placed under suspension and seeks a consequential order, to put the petitioner back to the same post held by him, earlier to the order of suspension.
2. Heard Sri.Ravi Hegde, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.Prashant S. Hosamani, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. Facts in brief, germane, are as follows:
The petitioner is appointed as KST constable at Koppal Division on 13.05.2016. Due to shortage of staff at the respondent - Kalyan Karnataka Road Transport Corporation, the petitioner was transferred to work in the respondent - Corporation. On 23.04.2024, a vigilance report comes alleging that the petitioner was found sleeping while on duty. The sleeping of the petitioner was video graphed and circ
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
