Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
MR.RAHUL PANDYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and initial facts (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding confidentiality breach (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court observations on contract versus criminal law (Para 6 , 9 , 12) |
| 4. ratio on breach of contract and criminal intent (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. order to quash fir and declaration of proceedings (Para 13) |
CAV ORDER
2. Heard Sri C.S.Ravi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri B.N. Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri K. Raghavendra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
The 2nd respondent/Samsung R & D Institute India-Bangalore Private Limited (‘the Company’ for short) is the complainant. The petitioner on completion of his Master’s in Engineering from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur and securing first rank accepts offer of employment offered by the 2nd respondent/Company after an interview. He joins the Company as an Associate Director in the Commercial Modem Software Development Team. The petitioner works for about a year and on 27-04-2020 tendered his resignation. After his resignation he sent documents from his official email id for reviewing his assigned responsibilities as a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
