Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
V KAMESWAR RAO, C M JOSHI, JJ
KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED (KPTCL) – Appellant
Versus
MRS. REKHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of parties and compensation claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments against maintainability and alternate remedies. (Para 4) |
| 3. discusses neglect by coffee plantation owner. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. negligence and regulatory compliance in electrocution cases. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. there is no negligence on the part of the appellant; illegal construction. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. understanding strict and absolute liability principles. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. calculation of compensation based on previous judgments. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. court's observations on prior compensation and its implications. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. argument on public law remedies and absolute liability. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 10. reasoning for maintenance of writ petitions in public remedies. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. legal concept of pain and suffering in compensation. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 12. details on accident and judicial findings. (Para 39) |
| 13. comparison of compensation claims to past cases. (Para 42) |
| 14. final decisions on liability and compensation amounts. (Para 63 , 64 , 85) |
CAV JUDGMENT
These appeals have been filed by the appellants viz., Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
