Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
H.P. SANDESH, J
SMT. VEDAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
SMT. KAMAKKA W/O HONNAPPA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background regarding the ownership of property. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments presented by the defendant regarding alleged errors in lower courts. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. substantial questions of law formulated for consideration. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. determination of undue influence or suspicious circumstances regarding the will. (Para 66 , 67 , 68 , 69) |
| 6. court's conclusion on the validity of execution of the will. (Para 70 , 74 , 75) |
| 7. final ruling on the appeal and its implications. (Para 78 , 79 , 80) |
CAV JUDGMENT
1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned counsel appearing for caveator-respondent No.1 and learned counsel for respondent No.2(a) and (b). This Court earlier heard the matter and answered only substantial question of law No.(ii) and directed to pay Commissioner fee, since an application is filed under Order 26 Rule 9 and 10A CPC was allowed by answering second substantial question of law and an observation was made that other substantial questions of law will be considered after getting report from the Commissioner. Now, the report of the Commissioner is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
