SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28333

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SHAIK AKRAM BASHA S/O SHAIK ANWAR BASHA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.P 100045 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100045 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC)/528(BNSS))

C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 102902 OF 2024 IN CRL.P. NO.100045 OF 2025:

BETWEEN:

SHAIK AKRAM BASHA S/O. SHAIK ANWAR BASHA AGED 27 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE JOB, R/O. H. NO. 31, WARD NO.23, VIJAYANAGARA COLONY, CANTONMENT, BALLARI-583 102.

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SABEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580008, THROUGH PSI, BALLARI WOMEN POLICE STATION, Digitally signed by B K MAHENDRAKUMAR BALLARI-580008, THROUGH PSI, Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BALLARI WOMEN POLICE STATION, D D H at A e: R 2 W 0 A 2 D 5. 0 B 2 E . N 13 C H

12:09:50 +0530 BALLARI-583102.

2. SMT. ZEBA KAUSAR W/O. SHAIK AKRAM BASHA AGED 24 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NEAR PARK, VIJAYANAGARA COLONY, CANTONMENT, BALLARI-583102.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. ANWAR BASHA B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, AND THE IMPUGNED FIR REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CRIME NO. 0189/2023 OF BALLARI WOMEN PS AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ALSO FILING OF CHARGE SHEET AND ALSO CRIMINAL CASE IN C.C.NO. 443/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BALLARI FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT-1961 AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1.

IN CRL.P. NO.102902 OF 2024:

BETWEEN:

1. SHAIK ANWAR BASHA S/O. LATE SHAIK MANSOOR AGED 66 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED PERSON, R/O. H.NO. 31, WARD NO.23, VIJAYANAGARA COLONY, CANTONMENT, BALLARI-583102.

2. NASEEMA BEGUM W/O. SHAIK ANWAR BASHA AGED 61 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED PERSON, R/O. NEAR PARK, VIJAYANAGARA COLONY, CANTONMENT, BALLARI-583102.

…PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SABEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD-580008, THROUGH PSI, BALLARI WOMEN POLICE STATION, BALLARI-583102.

2. SMT. ZEBA KAUSAR W/O. SHAIK AKRAM BASHA AGED 24 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. NEAR PARK, VIJAYANGARA COLONY, CANTONMENT, BALLARI-583102.

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1;

SRI. ANWAR BASHA B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C.

(U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, AND THE IMPUGNED FIR REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CRIME NO. 0189/2023 OF BALLARI WOMEN POLICE STATION, AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ALSO FILING OF CHARGE SHEET AND ALSO CRIMINAL CASE IN C.C.NO. 443/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF IV ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT BALLARI FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/SEC. 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC AND SEC. 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT-1961 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 AND 3.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioners in these petitions are sought to be prosecuted for offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 504, and 506 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. The prosecution alleges that accused No.1 is the husband and accused Nos.2 and 3 are the parents-in-law of the de facto complainant. It is alleged that they subjected her to physical and mental cruelty and demanded dowry from her parental home.

3. The parties are present before this Court and have filed an application for compounding, stating that they have amicably resolved the dispute among themselves. As per the terms of the settlement:

• Accused No.1 and the de facto complainant have agreed to dissolve their marriage mutually.

• Accused No.1 has agreed to pay a sum of ₹30 lakhs towards permanent alimony to the de facto complainant.

• The application is placed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top