2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 28427
Reserved on : 17.01.2025 Pronounced on : 07.02.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION No.15522 OF 2024 (GM - RES)
C/W WRIT PETITION No.18538 OF 2024 (GM – RES)
IN WRIT PETITION No.15522 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
SRI B.S.YEDDYURAPPA S/O LATE SIDDALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS R/AT NO.381, 6TH CROSS
80 FEET ROAD, RMV II STAGE DOLLARS COLONY BENGALRUU – 560 094.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI SANDEEP PATIL, ADVOCATE AND SMT. SWAMINI GANESH MOHANAMBAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATING DEPARTMENT (CID)
THE SADASHIV NAGAR POLICE SHESHADRIPURAM SUB-DIVISION BENGALURU CITY REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.
2. SRI SHAHSHANK SINGH S/O HARERAM SINGH AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS R/AT NO.D1181, DLF WESTEND HEIGHTS AKSHAYA NAGAR BENGALURU – 560 114.
AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 14.06.2024 ... RESPONDENTS (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR A/W., SRI ASHOK N.NAIK. SPL. PP FOR R1;
SRI S.BALAKRISHAN, ADVOVATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT DTD. 14.03.2024 FILED BEFORE THE SADHASHIVNAGAR POLICE, NOW INVESTIGATED BY THE RESPONDENT CID PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT-I, BENGALURU (VIDE ANNX-
A) AND ETC., IN WRIT PETITION No.18538 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1 . ARUNA Y. M., AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS NO.507, 4TH CROSS SANTHOSH NAGAR PIPELINE ROAD T.DASARAHALLI BENGALURU – 560 057.
2 . RUDRESHA MARULASIDDIAH S/O MARULASIDDIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS NO.14, SOMAPURA, KENGERI HOBLI VIDYAPEETA POST, BSK 6TH STAGE KENGERI, BENGALURU – 560 060.
3 . MARISWAMY G., S/O GANGADHARAYYA M., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS KAREGUDDADAHALLI CHIKKABANAVARA BENGALURU – 560 090.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI C.V.NAGESH, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI SANDEEP PATIL, ADVOCATE AND SMT. SWAMINI GANESH MOHANAMBAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATING DEPARTMENT (CID)
CARTLON HOUSE, PALACE ROAD BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUJTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA ... RESPONDENT (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR A/W., SRI ASHOK N.NAIK. SPL. PP FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR DATED 14.03.2024 IN CR. NO.84/2024 REGISTERED BY THE SADHASHIVNAGAR POLICE NOW INVESTIGATED BY RESPONDENT - CID IN CR. NO.9/2024 FOR OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 8 OF THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT, 2012 AND UNDER SECTION 354(A) OF IPC AND CONSEQUENT ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS THERETO PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURT - I (VIDE ANNEXURE B) AND ETC., THESE PETITIONS HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 17.01.2025, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CAV ORDER
WRIT PETITION NO. 15522 OF 2024
The petitioner is before this Court calling in question proceedings in Special C.C.No.1283 of 2024 pending before the Fast Track Special Court-I, Bengaluru arising out of Crime No.84 of 2024, re-registered as Crime No.9 of 2024 for offences punishable under Sections 354A, 204, 214 r/w 37 of the IPC and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (‘POCSO Act’ for short) and the consequent action of issuance of summons.
2. The facts, adumbrated, are as follows:-
The petitioner, an octogenarian, and former Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka, avers to be the most decorated politician, having been in politics for the last 54 years. It is the case of the prosecution that a complaint comes to be registered on 14-03-2024 alleging that the complainant along with her daughter who was a minor, visits the petitioner to seek help in respect of a cheating case relating to the trading business and her investments. It is alleged that the complainant spoke for about 9 minutes with regard to the manner in which she was cheated during the said period. At that point in time, both the mother and the daughter drink tea and leave the house after the said conversation. In the interregnum, it is said that the complainant insisted the petitioner to get the complainant’s case investigated by constituting a Special Investigating Team on the ground that she was cheated of several crores. It is then, the complainant alleges that the daughter complained to her that she was sexually assaulted by the petitioner taking her inside the room. This is the complaint so registered on 14-03-2024. The complaint then becomes a crime in Crime No.84 of 2024 initially for offences punishable under Section 8 of the POCSO Act and Section 354A of the IPC. Thereafter, the investigation is transferred to the Crime Investigation Department which registers a separate crime renumbering the earlier crime to be Crime No.9 of 2024.
3. A notice under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C. is issued upon the petitioner on 28-3-2024, asking his presence before the Investigating Officer, for questioning, in connection with the aforesaid crime. The petitioner is said to have given voice sample later. The petitioner on 10-06-2024 was again called and his statement was recorded. Another notice comes to be issued on 12-06-2024. The petitioner was to be away, from Bangalore and travel to New Delhi on account of his political commitments previously fixed. The Investigating Officer does not heed to the request for postponement of recording of statement of the petitioner, the Investigating Officer would secure a warrant of arrest at the hands of the concerned Court, which then drives the petitioner to this Court in the subject petition. This Court protects the petitioner by directing that no arrest of the petitioner should take place. During the pendency of the subject petition, the CID conducts investigation and files its final report before the concerned Court. The concerned Court registers Special C.C.No.1283 of 2024 by taking cognizance against the petitioner and others for the afore-quoted offences and issues summons to all. Issuance of summons leads the petitioner to file an application seeking amendment of the petition raising a challenge to the entire charge sheet and proceedings before the concerned Court. It is at that stage the matter is heard.
4. Heard Sri C.V.Nagesh, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Prof. Ravivarma Kumar, learned senior counsel/Special Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri S. Balakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
SUBMISSIONS
Petitioner’s
5. The learned senior counsel Sri C.V. Nagesh takes this Court through the complaint at the outset to contend that the first informant was by then a habitual complainant. She has registered 58 cases, against several people, and few cases are registered against her, by several people. This is to buttress his submission

















