Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
N. V. Anjaria, CJ, K. V. Aravind, J
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. implementation of court orders is essential to rule of law. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. non-compliance of court orders harms litigants' rights. (Para 3) |
| 3. a lack of compliance provisions in the karnataka litigation act needs addressing. (Para 5) |
| 4. contempt jurisdiction may be necessary to enforce compliance. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. proposed measures to ensure timely enforcement of court orders. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)
The speedy implementation of judgments and compliance of the orders of the court without delay are inextricably interwoven in the enforcement of rule of law. It is part of the observance of rule of law. The implementation of the orders of the court cannot be segregated from justice delivery, rather it is an integral part of doing a complete justice to the litigants. There is an absolute obligation on part of the State or other authorities to which the orders of the court are directed for compliance, and it is the duty of the court to ensure the obedience of the orders.
1.1 One of the measures to judge democratic commitment of any government is the respect it accords to the orders of the court. At the same time
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
