Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K.S. HEMALEKHA, J
FATHER MULLER CHARITABLE INSTITUTION – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek recognition as minority institutions. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding compliance with minority status requirements. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 3. court's observation on the necessity of prior recognition. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. rights and autonomy of minority institutions are emphasized. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. final order allowing the petition and affirming minority status. (Para 17) |
ORAL ORDER
"1. Issue writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or directions; directing the Respondents to publish the 'seat matrix' reserving 80%-'seats' to the students belonging to Karnataka Christian minorities; under (MC-I Category) and in the event if MC-I category student not being available under the said category, to allot seats to Christian Minority from other States during the counselling for B.Sc Nursing Course for the academic year 2023-24. Annexure A- A6.
2(A). Issue writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or directions, declaring the endorsement dated 8.08.2023 bearing No.DME/2023-24 issued by Respondent no.2 is bad in law and consequently direct the Respondents to treat the Petitioners as religious minorities for the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
