KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
MRUTHYANJAYA KUMAR @ RAHUL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks relief to quash proceedings. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. evidence insufficient to support charges. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORAL ORDER
"Wherefore, it is prayed that, this Hon'ble court may be pleased to call for the records in S.C.No.1698/2018 pending on LII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-53) and quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioner in S.C.No.1698/2018 pending on LII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore (CCH-53) for the offence punishable under sections 323, 324, 504, 506, 307 R/w 149 of IPC, in the interest of justice."
3. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that the petitioner was arraigned as accused No.1 in S.C.No.115/2014 for offences punishable under Section 323, 324, 504, 506, 307 and 149 IPC on the file of the LII Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (CCH-53), Bengaluru. The said case was split up insofar as petitioner is concerned and the same is pending in the instant S.C.No.1698/2018 before the Trial Court, in which the petitioner is arraigned as accused No.1. It is an undisputed fact borne out from the material on record that insofar as accused Nos.4 to 7 in the aforesaid S.C.No.115/2024 is concerned, the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.