Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI B.S. SURESHA – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the case, petitioner details. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding the issuance of summons. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the connection of petitioner to the case. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court’s ruling on summons under section 50 of pmla. (Para 11) |
| 5. final order quashing ecir and related actions. (Para 14) |
CAV ORDER
2. Heard Sri C.V. Nagesh, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Kamath, learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the respondent.
The petitioner is a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly. The genesis of the present petition is relatable to the accused in Crime No.11 of 2024. The present petitioner is not an accused. He has come into the picture as he is presently functioning as the Minister for Urban Development and Town Planning in the State of Karnataka. While investigating in to the offence pursuant to registration of ECIR against accused No.2, wife of the Chief Minister and petitioner in Criminal Petition No.1132 of 2025, the petitioner has been dragged into the proceedings. As observed hereinabove, the petitioner is dragged in only for the reason that he is presently holding the port
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
