Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SMT. PADMA MALINI G. RAO W/O SRI G.VENKATESH RAO – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAVI KARUMBAIAH S/O K. G. MANDANNA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. description of parties and factual background (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of legal disputes and allegations (Para 6 , 10) |
| 3. overview of complaints and prior legal history (Para 17 , 22) |
| 4. defining defamation and its exceptions (Para 19 , 21) |
| 5. outcome of the petitions and court orders (Para 24) |
CAV ORDER
Both these petitions are by common petitioners and complainants are different. The two are taken up together and considered by this common order.
2. In Crl.P.No.4241 of 2024, proceedings before the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore in C.C.No.50448 of 2024 registered for offence punishable under Section 500 of the IPC are called in question. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2, husband and wife.
3. In Crl.P.No.4250 of 2024 registration of a crime in Crime No.523 of 2010 and further proceedings pending before the X Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall Unit, Bangalore are called in question. The petitioners are accused Nos.1 and 2, husband and the wife, as obtaining in Crl.P.No.4241 of 2024.
4. Facts in brief, germane in Crl.P.No.4241 of 2024 are:
The 2nd petitioner is a practicing and a designated Senior Advocate pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
