Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J
SMT MUNIRAMAKKA D/O. LATE. CHIKKA @ CHIKKARAMAIAH W/O. DODDAIAH – Appellant
Versus
SMT DODDAMMA W/O CHANNIGOWDA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge of lower court order. (Para 1) |
| 2. preliminary objection raised on maintainability. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. petition dismissed with liberty for further application. (Para 4) |
ORAL ORDER
This writ petition is filed by the proposed applicant under
2. Sri Ravi H.K., the learned counsel who undertakes to appear for respondent Nos.16, 17 and 18 has raised a preliminary objection stating that the application filed by the petitioner herein under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC as an objector in the final decree proceedings is not maintainable, it is not an execution petition. Hence he sought for dismissal of the petition.
3. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate application in final decree proceedings.
4. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
