2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 29908
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
SRI JAGADEESH S – Appellant
Versus
DR GONCHIGARI NARAYANA – Respondent
WP 13204 / 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 13204 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI JAGADEESH S.
S/O G. SRINIVASULU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.98, MARUTHI INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560058.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAVEEN HEGDE, ADV.)
AND:
1. DR. GONCHIGARI NARAYANA S/O LATE GIRIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT NO.8, RED OAK PORT Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN N MOLINI, ILLINOIS-61265 Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA UNITED STATE OF AMERICA AT PRESENT R/AT NO.16/21, 3B, PEARL PALACE APARTMENT PALACE CROSS ROAD BENGALURU - 560020
2. SMT JAYANTHI NARAYANA W/O DR. GONCHIGARI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO 8, RED OAK PORT MOLINI, ILLINOIS - 61265 UNITED STATE OF AMERICA AT PRESENT R/AT NO 16/21, 3B PEARL PALACE APARTMENT PALACE CROSS ROAD BENGALURU - 560040
3. MISS PRIYADARSHINI NARAYANA D/O DR. GONCHIGARI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT NO 8, RED OAK PORT MOLINI, ILLINOIS - 61265 UNITED STATE OF AMERICA AT PRESENT R/AT NO.16/21, 3B, PEARL PALACE APARTMENT PALACE CROSS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560020 REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER SMT. JAYANTHI NARAYANA W/O DR. GONCHIGARI NARAYANA 4. SMT ANASUYA RAMAKRISHNA W/O G. RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO 1344, 3RD CROSS, MRHB COLONY, VIJAYANAGAR NORTH, BENGALURU - 560079.
5. MISS SHILPA RAMAKRISHNA D/O G. RAMAKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO 1344, 3RD CROSS, MRHB COLONY, VIJAYANAGAR NORTH, BENGALURU - 560079
6. SRI S Y KUMAR S/O SANNAVEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT HULIGERE VILLAGE, MADHULURU POST SIRA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT-572137.
7. SRI N R RAJANNA S/O RANGANATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.99/E, 16TH MAIN, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560040.
8. SRI SANNAVEERAPPA S/O LATE THIMAPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS R/AT HULIGERE VILLAGE MADHULURU POST SIRA TALUK-572137 TUMKUR DISTRICT
9. SRI VENAKTESHWARA EDUCATION TRUST NO.96, SRI MARUTHI INDUSTRIAL TOWN, PEENYA 2ND STAGE BENGALURU - 560058 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY SRI S. JAGADEESH …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.N.SHASHIDHARA, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI. H.S. SUHAS, ADV. FOR R1 TO R5, R6 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED, V/O DT: 25/10/2023 NOTICE TO R7 D/W, V/O DT: 25/10/2023 STEPS TO BRING LR's OF DECEASED R8 D/W V/O DT: 3/6/2022 NOTICE TO R9 D/W.)
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD: 03.03.2018 IN O.S.NO.1784/2012 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE [CCH NO.16] IN REJECTING [I.A.NO.12] VIDE ANNEXURE-F ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is by defendant No.1, in suit in O.S.No.1784/2012 pending consideration on the file of XVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-16) ('Trial Court' for short) being aggrieved by the order dated 03.03.2018 passed on IA No.12 filed by him under Order XIV Rule 5 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure.
2. The above suit is filed by the plaintiffs who are respondent Nos.1 to 5 herein seeking for the following reliefs:
(a) Directing the defendant No.1 to furnish books of accounts right from August 2005 till today, in respect of Sri. Venkateshwara Education Trust registered on 10.08.2005;
(b) For permanent injunction restraining defendants or anybody claiming under or through them from in any manner interfering with the affairs of Sri. Venkateshwara Education Trust and its Institutions;
(c) To remove defendant No.1 as Trustee as well as Secretary of Sri. Venkateshwara Education Trust;
(d) Declare that the action of the defendants in registering the document No.65/2007-08 dated 21.01.2008 amending the revoked Trust deed dated 03.08.2002 and subsequent action thereof, are null and void;
(e) Of scheme for Sri.Venkateshwara Education Trust and (f) To grant such other reliefs that this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, including the