Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
E.S.INDIRESH, J
SURESHGOUDA S/O. MANOHARGOUDA PATIL – Appellant
Versus
MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties' roles and relationships established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court hearing and parties represented. (Para 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by appellants and respondents. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's findings and application of law. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeals. (Para 10) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
These appeals are arising out of the judgment and decree dated 11.09.2013 in R.A.No.66/2010, 67/2010, 68/2010 and 72/2010 on the file of the District Judge Haveri allowing the appeal in R.A.No.68/2010 and dismissing the appeal in R.A.No.66/2010, R.A.No.67/2010 and R.A.No.72/2010 by modifying the shares in the judgment and decree dated 01.04.2010 in O.S.No.120/1999 and O.S.No.54/2013 on the file of the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Haveri decreeing the suit in part.
2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as per their rank in O.S.No.120/1999.
3. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff and defendants 2 to 5 are the children of Manoharagouda (defendant No.1), who died on 24.01.2005, and Smt.Savitri, who died during 1976. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff and defendants constitute Hindu Joint Family and the schedule properties are the joi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
