Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K.S. Mudagal, K. V. Aravind, JJ
SMT. T MUNEMMA W/O LATE T KANNAIAH – Appellant
Versus
K VENKATESHWARAIAH S/O KRISHNAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basic facts of the accident and claims. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. claims and defenses regarding negligence and compensation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. detailing contributions to negligence and compensation amounts. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments presented by appellants and respondents. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. evaluation of negligence and evidence by the court. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. assessment of compensation and liability allocation. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. compensation assessment for the second decree. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. final compensation calculations and order. (Para 35) |
| 9. conclusion and order of appeals. (Para 36) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
These appeals arise out of the common judgment and award in M.V.C.No.1911/2015 and M.V.C.No.1978/2015 passed by the XVIII Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes, MACT, Bangalore. The particulars of the appeals and the parties are set out in the tabular form:
2. On 10.02.2015 at 4.00 a.m. T.Bhanu Prasad and T.Shankar were proceeding in Toyoto Qualis bearing Registration No.KA-04-MH-5499. The car was being driven by T.Shankar. When that was proceeding near panchayat office, Narasipura village
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
