KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
SMT MAMATHA W/O LATE M.S. NAGEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRE GOWDA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the specific performance dispute. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the sale agreement. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's evaluation of evidence supporting plaintiff's claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 4. judicial discretion regarding specific performance discussed. (Para 18) |
| 5. conclusion stressing dismissal of the appeal. (Para 22) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to, based on their rankings before the trial Court. The appellant was defendant No.5, respondent No.1 was the plaintiff, and other respondents were other defendants.
The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for the relief of the specific performance of a contract. It is the case of the plaintiff that defendants Nos.1 to 4 are the absolute owners of the suit schedule property, and they agreed to sell the suit schedule property for valuable consideration of Rs.2,55,000/-. Accordingly, the defendants received Rs.25,000/- as an advance consideration amount on 24.12.2004. It was agreed that the balance sale consideration amount to be paid within four months from the date of execution of the sale agreement and the defendants shall get the title d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.