Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR, J
IBJI @ IBRAHIM S/O ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused is charged with multiple ipc offences. (Para 3 , 4 , 8) |
| 2. arguments about evidence and conviction are discussed. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court highlights crucial role of victim's testimony. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. final verdict issued with implications for the accused. (Para 28) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28th September 2020 passed in Sessions Case No.128/2012 by the Prl.Sessions Judge, D.K., Mangaluru.
2. The parties to this appeal are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court.
3. That the accused was charge sheeted by the Circle Inspector of Police, Bantwal Rural Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 447 , 304, 354, 307 and 506 of IPC based upon he complaint filed by the complainant-victim alleging that, on 03.06.2011 at about 5 p.m. that accused herein had committed criminal trespass into the courtyard of the complainant's mother Smt. Juliat Crasta's house, caught hold the complainant i.e., CW.1 and tried to outrage her modesty, abused her in filthy language, so also by brandishing MO No.1 Talwar towards her neck and attempted to commit her murder.
Thus, the ac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
