SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 30266

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Ramachandra D. Huddar, J
M/S M.K.AGRO TECH PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
SMT. RENUKA W/O LATE GAVI RANGAPPA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri. Praveen M.T

Table of Content
1. dishonour of cheque under section 138 ni act. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. presumptions concerning liability of cheque. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
3. evidence requirements for rebutting presumption. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
4. restoration of trial court's judgment. (Para 18 , 19)

ORAL JUDGMENT

2. The parties to this appeal are referred to as per their rank before the trial Court for convenience.

The complainant/appellant filed a complaint under Section 200 of Cr.P.C against the accused alleging offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for short 'NI Act'), stating that, complainant is a 'cooking oil manufacturing company' and the accused was the distributor of 'Sunpure cooking oil', running her business under the name and style of 'Renuka Enterprises and Trading', Brigade Road, Bhadravathi. It is stated that, the complainant's company has supplied the 'Sunpure cooking oil' to the accused on credit basis. The accused used to repay the amount for having received this cooking oil. It is stated that, in discharge of the said amount towards purchase of the 'Sunpure cooking oil' on 27.12.2017, accused issued a cheque bearing No.691663 in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top