Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
K NATARAJAN, VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL, JJ
ASFAK HAWALADAR – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL RESERVE POLICE FORCE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of appellant's candidacy and health conditions. (Para 2 , 3 , 7) |
| 2. argument regarding discrimination and guidelines. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's evaluation of procedural compliance with medical guidelines. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion emphasizing reevaluation of medical fitness standards. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. wrap-up of appeal outcome and further directives. (Para 15 , 16) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL)
This intra Court appeal is filed by challenging the order of the learned Single Judge dated 18.10.2022 passed in W.P.No.200130/2022 (S-RES), wherein the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismissed.
2. Brief facts leading to filing of this appeal are that, the appellant is an applicant for selection of posts of Constable (GD) in Central Armed Police Force (CAPF). The appellant cleared the physical test and thereafter, Detailed Medical Examination (hereinafter referred to as ‘DME’) was conducted, wherein he was declared as ‘unfit’. The appellant sought for Review Medical Examination (herein after referred to as ‘RME’). In the RME, the appellant was declared as unfit on the ground of Deviated Nasal Septum (herein after re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
