Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR ASHOK S.KINAGI, J
SRI. PARAMESHWARACHAR, S/O. HANUMANTHACHAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI. MALLACHAR KARNATAKA S/O. SHANKARACHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. final ruling on appeal and affirmations of lower court decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claims arose due to ownership disputes over properties. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments centered on evidence regarding the will's validity. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court discussion on admissions and burdens in property claims. (Para 18 , 24) |
| 5. substantial questions of law regarding evidence handling. (Para 19 , 32) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
2. For convenience, the parties are referred to based on their rankings before the trial Court. The Appellants were the plaintiffs, and the respondent was the defendant.
The plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant for the relief of declaration, to declare that the alleged Will dated 20.03.1997 is concocted, created, forged and not binding upon the plaintiffs as it is illegal, also sought for a declaration that the revenue records in MR.No.19/1998- 1999 is null and void, illegal and not binding on the plaintiffs, and for mandatory injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the suit schedule properties.
Mylarachar's wife died about 4 years prior to his death and they had no issues, and that the late Mylarachar and the plaintiffs are in possession and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
