Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
MR. M. NAGAPRASANNA, J
SRI C.N.GOVINDARAJU MANAGING DIRECTOR OF M/S. VAISHNAVI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY STATION HOUSE OFFICER BELLANDUR POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition challenging fir registration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background facts of joint development agreement. (Para 3 , 8) |
| 3. petitioners argue civil nature of dispute. (Para 4) |
| 4. respondent alleges criminal breaches by petitioners. (Para 5) |
| 5. court emphasizes procedural requirements for investigations. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. court quashes previous order and mandates compliance with bnss. (Para 15) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioners/accused Nos. 1 and 2 are at the doors of this Court calling in question registration of a crime in Crime No.733 of 2024, for offences punishable under Sections 316, 318, 336 and 340 of BNS, by Bellanduru Police Station arising out of PCR No.11817 of 2024, pending before the III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.
2. Heard Sri Prabhuling K.Navadgi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri B.N.Jagadeesha, learned Additional State Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1 and Sri Ravi B.Naik, learned senior counsel for Sri K.B.Mounesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2.
3. Facts, in brief, germane are as follows:-
The 2nd respondent is the complainant. The complainant is said to be owning certain lands in and aro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
